Tank vs Tank: UK Challenger 2 and French Leclerc go head to head - Master

Other world powers across the globe also use MBTs in their armies. Designing of the Challenger 2 began by Vickers Defence Systems now BAE as a private venture inby a deal was finalised for a demonstration vehicle, an order was placed by the MoD by The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin.

leclerc vs challenger 2

The armour of the Challenger 2 is among the best in the world. It is equipped with second generation Chobham armour this generation known as Dorchester which is said to be around two times stronger than steel. During conflict it can also have even more armour added with Explosive Reactive armour kits and additional bar armour can also be fitted. Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts.

In comparison the T has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive reactive armour. Differing again is the Leopard 2A6 which has core spaced armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off Chobham armour. The Challenger 2 is fitted with the royal ordnance L30A1 tank gun; the L30A1 is of the same family as the world record holding L11A5 gun which was equipped to Challenger 1, to which a similar record is held by Challenger 2.

The L30 is mm in diameter and calibers long, made from high tech steel with a chromium alloy lining. This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled. Other features include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation. The hesh rounds have a much longer range up to 5 miles further than APFSDS and are much more effective against buildings as well as thinner skinned vehicles.

The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. Like the Challenger 2 it also has a chromium lined barrel.

Tawas powder uses

The T can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. The commander has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving degree vision.

While the gunner is engaging the target the commander designates another, when the original target is destroyed the turret turns automatically and the process begins again. Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. Furthermore Abrams is also fitted with hunter killer optics.

In this year the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade. The fire control systems in the T and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. This goes through an 8 speed gear box 6 fwd, 2rev. It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as km by the British Army, this is however only on road.

The Ts prime mover is the BC Diesel engine which produces hp. The T has a top speed of 37mph and a range on road of km, the same as Challenger 2 although the T uses torsion bar suspension. The Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a much more powerful engine at just over hp.Tanks portal. In production since[3] the Leclerc entered French service in[3] replacing the AMX 30 as the country's main armoured platform.

Instudies were initiated about a possible replacement vehicle for the AMX main battle tank: the Engin Principal Prospectif. Inin view of the inferiority of the AMX 30 in comparison to the new generation of Soviet tanks about to be introduced, the Direction des Armements Terrestres ordered the beginning of the Char Futur project.

Ina working committee was created that in agreed on a list of specifications. Fundamental disagreements about its desired configuration led to a failure of this cooperation in December The importation of foreign equipment, like the M1 Abramsthe Leopard 2or the Merkavahad been studied and rejected.

In contrast to most Western programmes of the time, much consideration was given to active, besides passive protection, to limit the overall mass of the vehicle. Mobility for evading enemy fire and fire control systems were given particular attention.

Partnership with a foreign state was sought to limit the cost per unit, and this was found when the United Arab Emirates ordered vehicles, adding to the units already planned for the French Army. Inthe project was started under the name of "Leclerc", six prototypes being built swiftly. Mass production started in with the four-unit Batch 1, used mainly for comparative tests in foreign countries.

The 17 units of Batch 2 were shipped, with improvements in the turret and in the hull armour. These units were diagnosed with problems in the engine and suspension, and were quickly retired. Batch 3 followed with some improvements and have been used to define the doctrine of use, and instruction. Batches 4 and 5 were better built, eliminating the recurrent problems in the powerplant, and are still in service, after having been refitted at the end of the s.

The second series started with Batch 6, with an added climate control system in the right rear of the turret. Batch 7 introduced a transmission system to the command vehicle, and a data system giving instantaneous vision of the state of all battle tanks and acquired targets. It also incorporated minor improvements in the visor. All previous batches will be modernised up to the standards of Batch 9 from InBatch 10 was presented, incorporating new information systems which could share the disposition of enemy and friendly units to all vehicles on the battlefield, and a new armor package.

This was the beginning of the unit third series. Bytanks should have been operational, of them incorporated in four regiments, each of 80 Leclerc vehicles. As of [update]after a French defence review, each of the four regiments operated 60 Leclerc tanks for a total of in operational units; with a further in combat ready reserve.

Due to finance cuts, only tanks were fully operational in Why don't fictional characters say "goodbye" when they hang up a phone? If we can't tunnel through the Earth, how do we know what's at its center? All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply. Hottest Questions.

Previously Viewed. Unanswered Questions.

leclerc vs challenger 2

Tanks vehicle. Is the leclerc better than the challenger 2? Wiki User This is a difficult question to answer, as both tanks have never faced each other in armed combat.

However, there are a few categories we can analyze to make a comparison: First, the Challenger II is five years newer than the Leclerc, coming into service incompared to for the Leclerc.

Next, the Leclerc and Challenger are both armed with mm main guns, however, the Leclerc's is smooth-bored, while the Challenger II's is rifled. Whatever relatively small advantage one gun might have over the other, it is generally accepted that they are roughly equivalent, and neither would have a decisive superiority in a fight.

leclerc vs challenger 2

However, the Challenger II holds 52 rounds for its main armament, while the Leclerc carries "only" Nevertheless, in tank-vs-tank combat where both opponents are relatively equal, whoever fires first usually wins, so ammunition capacity will have a smaller impact in this regard. In terms of their speed, both are relatively fast, but the Leclerc holds an advantage, with a speed of 45 mph The Leclerc has a greater operational range than the Challenger II, miles km vs miles km.

But all that mobility comes at a price. Overall, the question of which is "better" rests upon the role intended for them. As a decisive breakthrough weapon, meant for deep, rapid advances through an enemy front, the Leclerc is the superior system.

However, in tank-vs-tank combat, the Challenger II, with its heavy armor and competitive gun not to say the Leclerc's weapon is inferiorplus its recent combat experience, would be more survivable than its French opponent. Ginette Leclerc died on January 2,in Paris, France. Asked in Military Equipment, Tanks vehicle Which tank is beter challenger 2 or leopard 2? The leopard 2 is better in all of its qualities I advise this one as I have both myself and the leopard 2 seems better.

Asked in Celebrities How tall is Percy Challenger? Asked in iPad 2 What is better than the iPad 2? Motorola xoom is much better than the iPad 2.

Declare constants in reactjs

Philippe Leclerc - Charles de Gaulle .Forums New posts New threadmarks Search forums. Tickets Open new ticket Watched. Spacebattles Merchandise. Spacebattles History. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. New threadmarks. Search forums. Log in.

In an effort to provide some measure of resources for our community, please read this thread for help and to offer suggestions for additional resources for our community and fellow members. JavaScript is disabled.

For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter Imperius Rex Start date Dec 18, Prev 1 2. First Prev 2 of 2 Go to page. Anduriel Not amused. Hesh wsa good against sloped homohenous armor. StolenMadWolf said:. As for the rifled barrel, it should be more accurate. I thought that was just an experimental concept that never worked with the Sheridan and MBT?

StolenMadWolf resident lab Wolf Nanowarrior. All modern tanks are already pretty much pinpoint accurate, the British just have a rifling fetish. And nope. And only some people say it about the SBer status You have no idea who he is?

2018 chevy silverado key fob programming

This might show he is an SBer, at least in spirit. Philophobe said:. I was under the impression that the Leopard 2a7 is the best tank in the world. Very fast, accurate and large main gun with a solid design. The Germans always could make a good tank. This is followed by the M1A2 Abrams, good all around sold tank, gas guzzler though I believe Then finally the Challanger 2, Perhaps even having the best armor After that sadly I can't say.

I know a bit about the french tank and Russia always makes good tanks but I don't know enough about them to comment. I'm sure the Isreli tank is good and very suited for it's role however I doubt it would fare well against the others in an open field. The Ariete MBTs need to be on team 2 to even the team because when the round start the french tank will surrender immediately and the Ariete will change to team 1 quickly so the team can be even.

EnderMorph said:. Also keep in mind Italian tanks have 1 gear for forward, 2 for reverse As far as I know, no other tank takes safe ammo storage as seriously as the Abrams does.Tanks portal.

Vickers Defence Systems began to develop a successor to Challenger 1 as a private venture in Production began in and the unit's tanks were delivered in Julyreplacing the Challenger 1. The tank entered service with the British Army inwith the last delivered in It is expected to remain in service until The Challenger 2 is an extensive redesign of the Challenger 1.

The Challenger 2 is equipped with a millimetre 4.

Fire control & digital systems on Challenger 2 and Leclerc

Unique among NATO main battle tank armament, the L30A1 is rifledbecause the British Army continues to place a premium on the use of High-explosive squash head HESH rounds in addition to armour-piercing fin-stabilised discarding-sabot rounds. Fifty main armament rounds [10] and 4, rounds of 7. The Challenger 2 has a four-man crew. The turret and hull are protected with second generation Chobham armour also known as Dorchester. On one occasion, in Augustduring the post-invasion stage of the Iraq Waran RPG was fired at a Challenger 2 that was climbing over a ramp.

The armour on its front underside hull, which was augmented with an explosive reactive armour package, was damaged, injuring several crew members. The tank subsequently returned to base under its own power and was quickly repaired and back on duty the following day. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challengera World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a pounder gun.

They evaluated the American M1 Abrams offered by General Dynamicsbut the Thatcher government chose to proceed with the Challenger 2 in December At the last of these milestones, Vickers was to have met 11 key criteria for the tank's design. Oman ordered 18 Challenger 2s in and a further 20 tanks in November Production began in at two primary sites: Elswick, Tyne and Wear and Barnbow, Leedsalthough over subcontractors were involved.

The first tanks were delivered in July The Challenger 2 failed the acceptance trials in and it was forced into the Progressive Reliability Growth Trial in Three vehicles were tested for simulated battlefield days. Each day consisted of:. The tank was then accepted into service in The tank exceeded all staff requirements. A British military document from indicated that the British Army would not procure a replacement for the Challenger 2 because of a lack of foreseeable conventional threats in the future.

Sources confirmed that the future of the MBT was being considered at the highest levels of the Army. This stemmed from the British Army's concern with the new Russian T Armata main battle tank and the growing ineffectiveness of the aging L30 rifled gun and its limited suite of ammunition.

Further, it was confirmed that numerous armoured vehicle manufacturers had discussions with the MoD about a potential replacement for the Challenger 2. It is fitted with a muzzle reference system and fume extractorand is controlled by an all-electric control and stabilization system. The turret has a rotation time of 9 seconds through degrees.The UK now fields only main battle tanks, a far cry from the or so strong inventory only a couple of decades ago.

During his military career he attended both the British and US staff colleges and undertook a Defence Fellowship at Glasgow University. He now works as a political, media, and defence and security consultant in Edinburgh and is a regular commentator on military and defence topics in the print and broadcast media.

My personal previous experience of tanks had been primarily on the old Chieftain, a sluggish and unreliable vehicle but one for which we came to have a grudging affection. I led a troop and subsequently a squadron of Chieftains during my time with the 4 th Royal Tank Regiment in the s.

We used to say that Chieftain was the best tank in the world as long as it broke down in a good fire position, and there was a strong element of truth in that statement. Its armour protection was good, its mm rifled gun powerful and accurate, but its automotive systems let it down. And by the time I commanded my squadron it was obsolescent if not obsolete.

Brief respite for the Royal Armoured Corps came with a part-fleet MBT replacement in the shape of Challenger 1, essentially a cancelled export order model for Iran which fell through with the removal of the Shah inbut it was clear then that Britain needed a new tank. The first draft of the Chieftain Replacement operational requirements paper dropped on to our desks in early Staffing the Chieftain Replacement paper became the major and most important aspect of my work over the next two years.

To go into all the technical requirements for the Chieftain Replacement would be boring in the extreme, and I dare say some of them are still classified. However the usual design parameters, including levels of armour protection, range, crew survivability, gun performance and communications fit amongst others, were set out clearly.

In the end there were three and a half main contenders for the contract in our eyes. However, at the time, and rightly or wrongly, it was deemed too much of a risk. There was also some totally fatuous opinion from elsewhere that a three man crew would make dismounted guard duties unduly onerous when in leaguer.

Such was the level of debate at that stage. We lived and breathed the project, discussing every aspect in minute detail time and again. So Leopard 2 was our recommendation. And obviously we were ignored.

Challenger 2

A final plea that at the very least Challenger 2 should mount the mm smoothbore fell on deaf ears. Obviously the Royal Armoured Corps ended up with Challenger 2, and in fairness if has proved to be not a bad MBT even although it has never been confronted by a peer or near-peer enemy. One of the options is updating Challenger 2 to allow it to soldier on untiland experiments have been undertaken to, believe it or not, mount the mm smoothbore gun as part of that upgrade.

The smoothbore has advantages including greater armour penetration than the British rifled gun and uses a tungsten penetrator that has none of the political and environmental baggage that comes with the British DU one. Word gets round if equipment is good and other countries tend to buy it. Leopard 2 has been bought by 18 countries with 4 more prospective purchasers.

M1 Abrams has been bought by 7 countries with two more in the offing. Challenger 2 has been bought by two — the UK and Oman. Maybe this time around the UK will be able to swallow its national pride and opt for the best option on offer no matter its country of provenance?

An interesting article after some recent posts in the comment section. The reputation of the L2 took a beating after Isis disabled 10 of them in Turkey.Which detail from Heart of Darkness shows the ineffectiveness of the colonizers. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.

Hottest Questions. Previously Viewed. Unanswered Questions. Tanks vehicle. Is the leclerc better than the challenger 2? Wiki User January 16, PM. This is a difficult question to answer, as both tanks have never faced each other in armed combat. However, there are a few categories we can analyze to make a comparison: First, the Challenger II is five years newer than the Leclerc, coming into service incompared to for the Leclerc.

Next, the Leclerc and Challenger are both armed with mm main guns, however, the Leclerc's is smooth-bored, while the Challenger II's is rifled. Whatever relatively small advantage one gun might have over the other, it is generally accepted that they are roughly equivalent, and neither would have a decisive superiority in a fight. However, the Challenger II holds 52 rounds for its main armament, while the Leclerc carries "only" Nevertheless, in tank-vs-tank combat where both opponents are relatively equal, whoever fires first usually wins, so ammunition capacity will have a smaller impact in this regard.

In terms of their speed, both are relatively fast, but the Leclerc holds an advantage, with a speed of 45 mph The Leclerc has a greater operational range than the Challenger II, miles km vs miles km. But all that mobility comes at a price. Overall, the question of which is "better" rests upon the role intended for them. As a decisive breakthrough weapon, meant for deep, rapid advances through an enemy front, the Leclerc is the superior system.

However, in tank-vs-tank combat, the Challenger II, with its heavy armor and competitive gun not to say the Leclerc's weapon is inferiorplus its recent combat experience, would be more survivable than its French opponent. Ginette Leclerc died on January 2,in Paris, France. Asked in Military Equipment, Tanks vehicle Which tank is beter challenger 2 or leopard 2? The leopard 2 is better in all of its qualities I advise this one as I have both myself and the leopard 2 seems better.

Asked in Celebrities How tall is Percy Challenger? Asked in iPad 2 What is better than the iPad 2?

Sdl opengl antialiasing

Motorola xoom is much better than the iPad 2. Philippe Leclerc - Charles de Gaulle.

Tank vs Tank: UK Challenger 2 and French Leclerc go head to head - International Version

Charles de GaulleMarechal Leclerc I think halo 4 is a bit better than black ops 2 because it has has better graphics and it has a better gameplay. I think the first is better than the second. Challenger and Columbia.

leclerc vs challenger 2

Other than drivetrain similarities, they're 2 totally different types of cars. From my point of view, Just Cause 2 is much better than Mercenaries 2. Trending Questions.